Hi,
As the signature of receiveCall is receiveCall(string sender-id, string
msg-id, map message) , it makes sense indeed for consistency to change
the signature of call to :
call(string recipient-id, string msg-id, map message)
as you are suggesting.
Thomas
Alasdair Allan wrote:
>
> Just noticed that call( ) (see p19, section 3.10) is the odd method
> out, with a prototype of
>
> call(string rcepient-id, map message, string msg-id )
>
> which is the other way round to all the other methods. Should this
> instead be,
>
> call(string rcepient-id, string msg-id, map message)
>
> like the rest? If not, is there a reason why its different?
>
> Cheers,
> Al.
Received on 2008-05-07Z16:16:48