Mark Taylor wrote:
> Alasdair Allan wrote:
>> ...wouldn't it make sense to have a hub.event.* set of messages
>
> I almost completely agree with this, for the reasons that you cover -
> hub.event.stopping (and possibly other hub.event.*) messages should
> exist separate from app.event.* ones.
Good!
> The only thing I disagree with is:
>
>> have a hub.event.* set of messages that all (callable) clients
>> were required to be able interpret rather than having each client
>> call getHubId() and then
>
> there is no *requirement* for callable clients to interpret such an
> MType - they can ignore it (at their peril) if they want.
Ouch. Okay, that is fair enough on consideration, especially if we introduce a hub.event.* set of messages...
Cheers,
Al.
Received on 2008-05-12Z15:03:42