Re: call( ) and (incorrect?) argument order

From: Mark Taylor <m.b.taylor-at-bristol.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 14:56:25 +0100 (BST)


On Mon, 12 May 2008, Alasdair Allan wrote:

> For information, in the pre-alpha hub I shipped last week I flipped the
> msg-id and message in call( ) and callAll( ). I'm happy either way though...

OK, since nobody else seems to have strong opinions and you've gone ahead and done it, I'll modify the ordering in the document to match your implementation:

    call(string recipient-id, string msg-id, map message)     callAll(string msg-id, map message)

-- 
Mark Taylor   Astronomical Programmer   Physics, Bristol University, UK
m.b.taylor@bris.ac.uk +44-117-928-8776 http://www.star.bris.ac.uk/~mbt/
Received on 2008-05-13Z15:56:21