Paul Harrison wrote:
> Reading though the list, there seems to be a fair bit of
> disagreement about the scope of this standard - why not take the
> approach that has been taken in other areas and first define a
> "simple" version of the protocol, which is essentially has exactly
> the same scope as PLASTIC as it currently stands ... I think that a
> decision to make a slightly cleaned up PLASTIC *the* Simple
> application messaging standard would be a great benefit to the VO.
I agree with Paul, I think this would be of great benefit to everyone.
Al. Received on 2007-02-13Z11:20:42