ok but DAL-1 is paralelle with GWS ..
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 09:00:23AM -0600, Doug Tody wrote:
> It seems to me that the bulk of the technical discussion should be in the
> VOQL sessions since this is where the development has been up to this point
> and since ADQL and SkyNode are closely linked. This will provide enough
> time to look in detail at experience with trial implementations and the
> details of ADQL. We should then have a session in the DAL WG to discuss
> SkyNode from the DAL perspective and start to take a look at the issues
> of merging ADQL capabilities into DAL services. Probably this will then
> become a major focus of DAL for the next year. VOQL precedes DAL in the
> agenda so this should work out well. Does that sound reasonable? Doug
>
>
> On Fri, 14 May 2004, Tony Linde wrote:
>
> > Looks like the best approach for now.
>
> > Maybe we could make the first session of the VOQL group at Boston a focus on
> > SkyNode with a view to nailing down this spec and invite the DAL group to
> > join us to help ensure common features have common expression so that a
> > future merging of the specs is easier??
> >
> > Tony.
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Wil O'Mullane [mailto:womullan-at-skysrv.pha.jhu.edu]
> > > Sent: 14 May 2004 14:21
> > > To: Tony Linde
> > > Cc: 'Doug Tody'; architecture-at-ivoa.net
> > > Subject: Re: Proposed agenda for DAL session at the May
> > > Interop meeting (fwd)
> > >
> > > > SkyNode specifies the methods and parameters that any data access
> > > > service must provide. One of the input parameters to the
> > > query method
> > > > is the query itself and ADQL is the format that that query is in.
> > > This is exactly how we dicussed skynode when I was asked to
> > > break it in a seperate document from ADQL.
> > >
> > > Perhaps we should continue then to develop this spec under VOQL.
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
Received on 2004-05-14Z15:20:32