I'd certainly prefer DAL-1 for the SkyNode session - I couldn't duck out of
Regsitry!
If you do shuffle sessions, can we leave VOQL1, DAL1, DM1 as they're nicely set up not conflicting with any of the Registry sessions and I'd like a chance to get to one each of them.
Cheers,
Tony.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Doug Tody [mailto:dtody-at-nrao.edu]
> Sent: 14 May 2004 16:34
> To: Wil O'Mullane
> Cc: Tony Linde; masatoshi.ohishi-at-nao.ac.jp; architecture-at-ivoa.net
> Subject: Re: Proposed agenda for DAL session at the May
> Interop meeting (fwd)
>
> I had in mind DAL-2 but I see it is in parallel with
> registry-1 which probably isn't too good either. We can
> adjust the agenda to do it either
> way. Let me know what you prefer. Doug
>
>
> On Fri, 14 May 2004, Wil O'Mullane wrote:
>
> > ok but DAL-1 is paralelle with GWS ..
> >
> > On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 09:00:23AM -0600, Doug Tody wrote:
> > > It seems to me that the bulk of the technical discussion
> should be in the
> > > VOQL sessions since this is where the development has
> been up to this point
> > > and since ADQL and SkyNode are closely linked. This will
> provide enough
> > > time to look in detail at experience with trial
> implementations and the
> > > details of ADQL. We should then have a session in the
> DAL WG to discuss
> > > SkyNode from the DAL perspective and start to take a look
> at the issues
> > > of merging ADQL capabilities into DAL services. Probably
> this will then
> > > become a major focus of DAL for the next year. VOQL
> precedes DAL in the
> > > agenda so this should work out well. Does that sound
> reasonable? Doug
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, 14 May 2004, Tony Linde wrote:
> > >
> > > > Looks like the best approach for now.
> > >
> > > > Maybe we could make the first session of the VOQL group
> at Boston a focus on
> > > > SkyNode with a view to nailing down this spec and
> invite the DAL group to
> > > > join us to help ensure common features have common
> expression so that a
> > > > future merging of the specs is easier??
> > > >
> > > > Tony.
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Wil O'Mullane [mailto:womullan-at-skysrv.pha.jhu.edu]
> > > > > Sent: 14 May 2004 14:21
> > > > > To: Tony Linde
> > > > > Cc: 'Doug Tody'; architecture-at-ivoa.net
> > > > > Subject: Re: Proposed agenda for DAL session at the May
> > > > > Interop meeting (fwd)
> > > > >
> > > > > > SkyNode specifies the methods and parameters that
> any data access
> > > > > > service must provide. One of the input parameters to the
> > > > > query method
> > > > > > is the query itself and ADQL is the format that
> that query is in.
> > > > > This is exactly how we dicussed skynode when I was asked to
> > > > > break it in a seperate document from ADQL.
> > > > >
> > > > > Perhaps we should continue then to develop this spec
> under VOQL.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> >
>
Received on 2004-05-14Z16:19:15