Tony, Doug, Wil et al.
It seems to me that I should not have left from my office in the last 48 hours !! I can't follow what people discuss !! Too many SPAMs, too many important emails to follow. I will respond during this weekend.
I agree with Doug and Wil in that we continue to discuss SkyNode under VOQL group. I note that SkyNode is related with both (or more) groups and we have to share relevant information among these groups.
Draft agenda for the VOQL group is ready, and relation with other WGs will be discussed in DAY-2, at this moment.
Cheers,
Masatoshi
At 14:43 04/05/14 +0100, Tony Linde wrote:
>
>Looks like the best approach for now.
>
>Maybe we could make the first session of the VOQL group at Boston a focus on
>SkyNode with a view to nailing down this spec and invite the DAL group to
>join us to help ensure common features have common expression so that a
>future merging of the specs is easier??
>
>Tony.
Received on 2004-05-15Z01:11:22