Yes but "The binary data is still kept as external links in a STREAM element"
If that is what we are talking about then there is no problem... what I *thought* was the problem included the possibility of converting spectral data in the form of FITS tables entirely to VOTable (probably OK?) and back again. But if no-one wants to do that, that is fine...
a
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, Marco C. Leoni wrote:
> Anita,
> about the conversions FITS<--->VOTable there was the proposal from
> Andreas, please have a look at: http://www.ivoa.net/forum/votable/0217.htm
>
>
> Cheers,
> Marco
>
>
> Anita Richards wrote:
>
> >On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, Markus Dolensky wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >>>However
> >>>unless I ahve misunderstood the debate, there is no question that the data
> >>>_can_ be handled, it is simply a question of how,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>The question is whether we can perform the conversion between VOTable and FITS
> >>format using off the shelve tools (XSLT). If not we need to write Astronomy
> >>specific parsers which 'understand' the data whereas we would prefer to apply
> >>just syntax rules instead.
> >>
> >>Markus
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >For FITS to VOTable, there is also the tool being developed by VO India
> >http://vo.iucaa.ernet.in/~voi/votableStreamWriter.htm
> >which is indended to eventually cope with FITS.
> >
> >But what about the reverse? That is more difficult, surely?
> >
> >cheers
> >a
> >
> >- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> >Dr. Anita M. S. Richards, AVO Astronomer
> >MERLIN/VLBI National Facility, University of Manchester,
> >Jodrell Bank Observatory, Macclesfield, Cheshire SK11 9DL, U.K.
> >tel +44 (0)1477 572683 (direct); 571321 (switchboard); 571618 (fax).
> >
> >
>
Received on 2003-11-27Z19:15:15