Re: Comments on SIA 1.0

From: Roy Williams <roy-at-cacr.caltech.edu>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 11:25:05 -0800


Doug
But we also need to make the original SIA specification complete and accurate. My understanding is that SIA2 is a separate protocol from SIA, it is not a replacement. Is that correct? Roy

Doug Tody wrote:
> Fabien - Thanks, this should help with the SIA V2 planning which goes
> forward later this year. - Doug
>
>
> On Fri, 16 Feb 2007, Fabien Chereau wrote:
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I have been recently working on a python library for setting up SIA
>> servers in ESO, and an associated C++ client to parse the SIA query
>> results.
>> I based my work on the SIA 1.0 specification working draft and
>> encountered a number of issues summarized on this wiki page:
>> http://wiki.eurovotech.org/twiki/bin/view/VOTech/SiaComments
>>
>> This wiki page also contains suggestion of modifications to the SIA
>> specification document which could help solving the issues.
>>
>> Any comment is very welcome,
>>
>> Regards,
>> Fabien Chereau
>>
>
Received on 2007-02-16Z20:25:40