Dear All,
I have tried to compare the spatial part (to start with) of the various
coverage models I have seen so far.
Notes:
- Polarisation not included.
- Probably too biased towards the optical regime; please, X, Radio,
Interferometry experts: intervene!
- Bob, Pat, Doug: My apologies if I have missed something, please
send me any necessary corrections.
- Suggested names are likely to change after similar work on other
axes is carried out (aim: uniform description of different axes).
- I still have to read Arnold's STC Metadata document! It should
really be included in the comparison here. But since reading it
could take me a while, may I ask you
Arnold to help me filling the gap ? sorry ...
Alberto
http://archive.eso.org/~amicol/VO/DM/coverage/spatial_comparison.html
<http://archive.eso.org/%7Eamicol/VO/DM/coverage/spatial_comparison.html>
Received on 2003-11-06Z00:11:46