dm: by date

Monday, 31 May
- Re: [Passband] diverting into SEDs Doug Tody
- Re: [Passband] a useful self-contained model? Martin Hill
- Re: [Passband] diverting into SEDs Martin Hill
- Re: [Passband] a useful self-contained model? Alberto Micol
- Re: [Passband] a useful self-contained model? Martin Hill
- Re: [Passband] a useful self-contained model? Anita Richards
- [Passband] a useful self-contained model? Martin Hill
Thursday, 27 May
- VOList Guy Rixon
Tuesday, 25 May
- Documents for DM WG meeting Jonathan McDowell
- Utypes and SIAP evolution Francois Bonnarel
Sunday, 23 May
- Re: STC documents and schemas Arnold Rots
Friday, 21 May
- STC documents and schemas Arnold Rots
Thursday, 20 May
- Re: Data modelling using the Wiki Jonathan McDowell
- Data modelling using the Wikki Martin Hill
- Re: Methods to serialise - Re: [QUANTITY] doc consistency Guy Rixon
Wednesday, 19 May
- Re: [QUANTITY] doc consistency Patrick Dowler
- Re: [OBSERVATION]Observation data model/comments/Resolution... Martin Hill
- Re: [QUANTITY] doc consistency Brian Thomas
- Methods to serialise - Re: [QUANTITY] doc consistency Martin Hill
- Re: [QUANTITY] doc consistency Pierre Didelon
- Re: [OBSERVATION]Observation data model/comments/Resolution... Mireille Louys
- Re: Error column in VOResource->DM-Quantity <=> VOTable-PARAM Pierre Didelon
- Re: Error column in VOResource Ed Shaya
- Re: Error column in VOResource->DM-Quantity <=> VOTable-PARAM Martin Hill
- Re: Error column in VOResource->DM-Quantity <=> VOTable-PARAM Pierre Didelon
- Re: Error column in VOResource->DM-Quantity <=> VOTable-PARAM Martin Hill
Tuesday, 18 May
- Re: Is XPATH the way to search a data model? Matthew Graham
- Re: Is XPATH the way to search a data model? David Berry
- Re: [QUANTITY] Choosing default accuracy/units values Martin -at- ROE
- Re: [QUANTITY] Choosing default accuracy/units values Brian Thomas
- Re: Is XPATH the way to search a data model? Brian Thomas
- Re: Is XPATH the way to search a data model? Guy Rixon
- Re: Is XPATH the way to search a data model? Guy Rixon
- Re: Is XPATH the way to search a data model? Martin -at- ROE
- Re: Is XPATH the way to search a data model? David Berry
- Re: Is XPATH the way to search a data model? Martin -at- ROE
- Re: Is XPATH the way to search a data model? David Berry
- Re: Is XPATH the way to search a data model? David Berry
- Re: Is XPATH the way to search a data model? Guy Rixon
- RE: Is XPATH the way to search a data model? Gerard Lemson
- Re: [QUANTITY] Choosing default accuracy/units values Pierre Didelon
- Re: Is XPATH the way to search a data model? Pierre Didelon
Monday, 17 May
- Re: Is XPATH the way to search a data model? Matthew Graham
- Re: Is XPATH the way to search a data model? Ed Shaya
- Re: Is XPATH the way to search a data model? Brian Thomas
- Is XPATH the way to search a data model? David Berry
- Re: Boston agenda Brian Thomas
- Boston agenda Jonathan McDowell
- Re: [QUANTITY] Choosing default accuracy/units values Patrick Dowler
- [QUANTITY] Choosing default accuracy/units values (Was: Re: [QUANTITY] doc consistency Brian Thomas
- Re: [QUANTITY] doc consistency Guy Rixon
- Re: [QUANTITY] doc consistency Jonathan McDowell
- Re: A plehtora of Quantities Ed Shaya
- Re: [QUANTITY] moving on Jonathan McDowell
- Re: [QUANTITY] moving on Guy Rixon
- Re: A plehtora of Quantities Guy Rixon
- Re: [QUANTITY] moving on Guy Rixon
- Re: [QUANTITY] doc consistency Pierre Didelon
- Re: Putting the pieces together... Jonathan McDowell
- [OBSERVATION] Re: Observation data model comments Jonathan McDowell
Saturday, 15 May
- Re: Observation data model comments Francois Bonnarel
Friday, 14 May
- Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 Francois Bonnarel
- Re: [QUANTITY] doc consistency Brian Thomas
- Re: Putting the pieces together... Thomas McGlynn
- Re: A plehtora of Quantities Patrick Dowler
- Re: [QUANTITY] doc consistency Jonathan McDowell
- Re: Modelling small things Doug Tody
- Re: Modelling small things Brian Thomas
- Modelling small things Martin Hill
- Serialisation Martin Hill
- [Observation] draft observations Martin Hill
- Re: Q as inheritor or aggregator? Re: Quantity - where does it fit? Brian Thomas
- Q as inheritor or aggregator? Re: Quantity - where does it fit? Brian Thomas
- Re: [Observation] - Scope? Jonathan McDowell
- Re: [Observation] - Scope? Martin Hill
- Re: [Observation] - Scope? Jonathan McDowell
- [Observation] - Scope? Martin Hill
- Quantity - how is it used? Martin Hill
- Re: A plehtora of Quantities Guy Rixon
- Re: A plehtora of Quantities Guy Rixon
- Re: Quantity - where does it fit? David Berry
- Re: Quantity - where does it fit? Martin Hill
- Re: A plehtora of Quantities David Berry
- Re: A plehtora of Quantities David Berry
- Re: A plehtora of Quantities Guy Rixon
- Re: A plehtora of Quantities Guy Rixon
- Re: Quantity - where does it fit? David Berry
- Quantity - where does it fit? Martin Hill
- Re: A plehtora of Quantities David Berry
- Re: A plehtora of Quantities Martin Hill
- Re: A plehtora of Quantities David Berry
- Re: A plehtora of Quantities Guy Rixon
- Re: A plehtora of Quantities Guy Rixon
- Re: Serialising vs modelling David Berry
- Re: Serialising vs modelling Doug Tody
Thursday, 13 May
- Re: Putting the pieces together... Ivo Busko
- Re: A plehtora of Quantities Ed Shaya
- UTYPE: Comments on Alberto's note Jonathan McDowell
- Re: [QUANTITY] moving on Jonathan McDowell
- Re: Vector-valued Quantities David Berry
- Definition of Frames. Brian Thomas
- Re: A plehtora of Quantities martin hill
- Re: Vector-valued Quantities Ed Shaya
- Re: Serialising vs modelling Gerard Lemson
- No requirements?!? (Was: Re: Serialising vs modelling Brian Thomas
- Re: Vector-valued Quantities David Berry
- Re: [QUANTITY] moving on Alberto Micol
- Re: Vector-valued Quantities Ed Shaya
- Re: A plehtora of Quantities Ed Shaya
- Re: Serialising vs modelling Alberto Micol
- Re: [QUANTITY] moving on Jonathan McDowell
- Re: Inheritance of different Q's David Berry
- Re: [QUANTITY] moving on martin hill
- Re: Vector-valued Quantities David Berry
- Putting the pieces together... Thomas McGlynn
- Re: Inheritance of different Q's Brian Thomas
- Re: [QUANTITY] doc consistency Pierre Didelon
- Re: Vector-valued Quantities Brian Thomas
- Inheritance of different Q's David Berry
- Vector-valued Quantities David Berry
- Re: A plehtora of Quantities Alberto Micol
- Re: A plehtora of Quantities Ed Shaya
- Re: [QUANTITY] doc availability Jonathan McDowell
- [QUANTITY] doc availability Pierre Didelon
- RE: Serialising vs modelling Gerard Lemson
Wednesday, 12 May
- Re: A plehtora of Quantities David Berry
- Re: Serialising vs modelling Alberto Micol
- Re: Serialising vs modelling David Berry
- Re: Proposal to split out the "members" from coreQ (Was: Re: Philosophy of basic Q) David Berry
- Serialising vs modelling Martin Hill
- [QUANTITY] : Examples available (Was: Re: Not a plethora (Was: Re: A plehtora of Quantities Brian Thomas
- Re: Proposal to split out the "members" from coreQ (Was: Re: Philosophy of basic Q) Martin Hill
- Re: Proposal to split out the "members" from coreQ (Was: Re: Philosophy of basic Q) Pierre Didelon
- Re: Not a plethora (Was: Re: A plehtora of Quantities Martin Hill
- [QUANTITY] XMLSpy graphs out of date (Was: Re: BQ with Meta-data.. (Was: Re: Decomposition (Was: Re: Philosophy of basic Q (Was: Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 Brian Thomas
- [QUANTITY] How to store coords, why iteration order is ok in locator (Was: Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 Brian Thomas
- Re: Proposal to split out the "members" from coreQ (Was: Re: Philosophy of basic Q) David Berry
- Re: BQ with Meta-data.. (Was: Re: Decomposition (Was: Re: Philosophy of basic Q (Was: Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 Pierre Didelon
- Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 David Berry
- Re: Proposal to split out the "members" from coreQ (Was: Re: Philosophy of basic Q) Pierre Didelon
- Re: Proposal to split out the "members" from coreQ (Was: Re: Philosophy of basic Q) Brian Thomas
- Re: Proposal to split out the "members" from coreQ (Was: Re: Philosophy of basic Q) David Berry
- Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 Brian Thomas
- Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 David Berry
- Re: Not a plethora Jonathan McDowell
- BQ with Meta-data.. (Was: Re: Decomposition (Was: Re: Philosophy of basic Q (Was: Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 Brian Thomas
- Not a plethora (Was: Re: A plehtora of Quantities Brian Thomas
- Re: [OBSERVATION] Re: Observation data model comments Anita Richards
- A plehtora of Quantities Martin Hill
- On Accuracy Martin Hill
- Re: Decomposition (Was: Re: Philosophy of basic Q (Was: Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 Pierre Didelon
- Decomposition and the Searchability of Q and Accuracy is important (Was: Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 Brian Thomas
- [BOSTON] Data Models at Interop Jonathan McDowell
- [OBSERVATION] Re: Observation data model comments Jonathan McDowell
- Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 Jonathan McDowell
Tuesday, 11 May
- Re: Proposal to split out the "members" from coreQ (Was: Re: Philosophy of basic Q) Brian Thomas
- Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 Brian Thomas
- Re: Proposal to split out the "members" from coreQ (Was: Re: Philosophy of basic Q) David Berry
- Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 David Berry
- Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 Brian Thomas
- Proposal to split out the "members" from coreQ (Was: Re: Philosophy of basic Q) Brian Thomas
- Decomposition (Was: Re: Philosophy of basic Q (Was: Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 Brian Thomas
- Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 David Berry
- Compound Mappings David Berry
- Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 Brian Thomas
- Re: Philosophy of basic Q David Berry
- Re: [MAPPING] A draft doc David Berry
- Re: Philosophy of basic Q Patrick Dowler
- Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 David Berry
- Re: Philosophy of basic Q (Was: Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 David Berry
- Philosophy of design for Q : yes, a common structure is appropriate and possible. (Was: Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 Brian Thomas
- Re: Collection of use-case code David Berry
- Re: No set methods in the API ? (Was: Re: Relationship between Q and STC - Frames & Mapping Martin Hill
- Re: Philosophy of basic Q (Was: Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 Martin -at- ROE
- No set methods in the API ? (Was: Re: Relationship between Q and STC - Frames & Mapping Brian Thomas
- Re: Relationship between Q and STC - Frames & Mapping David Berry
- Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 Brian Thomas
- Philosophy of basic Q (Was: Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 Brian Thomas
- Collection of use-case code? (Was: Re: a Quantity to rule them all? Not quite. Brian Thomas
- [MAPPING] A draft doc Jonathan McDowell
- Re: Relationship between Q and STC - Frames & Mapping Martin Hill
- Re: Relationship between Q and STC - Frames & Mapping David Berry
- Re: Relationship between Q and STC - Frames & Mapping David Berry
- Re: a Quantity to rule them all? Not quite. David Berry
- Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 David Berry
- Radio data providers Anita Richards
- Re: Relationship between Q and STC - Frames & Mapping Martin Hill
- Re: Relationship between Q and STC - Frames & Mapping Martin Hill
- Re: a Quantity to rule them all? Not quite. Martin Hill
- a Quantity to rule them all? Not quite. Alberto Micol
- Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 David Berry
- Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 Martin -at- ROE
- Re: Data Model for Quantity v0.5 - inheritance vs aggregation Martin Hill
- Re: Relationship between Q and STC - Frames & Mapping David Berry
- Re: Observation data model comments Anita Richards
- Re: [OBSERVATION] Alberto's introduction Anita Richards
- Re: Observation data model comments Anita Richards
- Re: Observation data model comments Pierre Didelon
- Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 Jonathan McDowell
- Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 Jonathan McDowell
- Re: Observation data model comments Jonathan McDowell
- [OBSERVATION] Alberto's introduction Jonathan McDowell
- Re: Relationship between Q and STC - Frames & Mapping Brian Thomas
Monday, 10 May
- Re: Relationship between Q and STC - Frames & Mapping Martin Hill
- Re: Observation data model comments Jonathan McDowell
- Re: Data Model for Quantity v0.5 - inheritance vs aggregation Brian Thomas
- Re: Relationship between Q and STC David Berry
- Re: Relationship between Q and STC Arnold Rots
- Re: Data Model for Quantity v0.5 - inheritance vs aggregation Brian Thomas
- Re: Relationship between Q and STC Brian Thomas
- Re: Relationship between Q and STC David Berry
- Re: Data Model for Quantity v0.5 - inheritance vs aggregation Patrick Dowler
- Re: Relationship between Q and STC Brian Thomas
- Re: Relationship between Q and STC David Berry
- Re: UTYPEs and UCDs Martin -at- ROE
- Re: Relationship between Q and STC Brian Thomas
- Re: UTYPEs and UCDs David Berry
- UTYPEs and UCDs Jonathan McDowell
- Re: Relationship between Q and STC David Berry
- Re: UTYPES David Berry
- Relationship between Q and STC (Was: Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 Brian Thomas
- Re: Heaviness of Q (Was: Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 - inheritance vs aggregation David Berry
- Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 - Serialisation Martin Hill
- Re: Heaviness of Q (Was: Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 - inheritance vs aggregation Brian Thomas
- Re: UTYPES Alberto Micol
- Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 David Berry
- Re: Explainations of interface/serializations (what is required) (Was: Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 Brian Thomas
- Re: The relationship of Q and STC? A proposal. (Was: Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 Arnold Rots
- Re: Heaviness of Q (Was: Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 - inheritance vs aggregation Martin -at- ROE
- Re: UTYPES David Berry
- Re: Heaviness of Q (Was: Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 - inheritance vs aggregation Martin -at- ROE
- Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 - more on Quantity vs assembly David Berry
- Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 - inheritance vs aggregation David Berry
- The relationship of Q and STC? A proposal. (Was: Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 Brian Thomas
- Re: Explainations of interface/serializations (what is required) (Was: Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 Pierre Didelon
- Re: Explainations of interface/serializations (what is required) (Was: Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 Brian Thomas
- Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 Alberto Micol
- Re: Explainations of interface/serializations (what is required) (Was: Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 David Berry
- UTYPES Alberto Micol
- Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 - more on Quantity vs assembly Martin -at- ROE
- Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 - inheritance vs aggregation Martin Hill
- Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 - Serialisation Guy Rixon
- Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 - more on Quantity vs assembly Pierre Didelon
- Explainations of interface/serializations (what is required) (Was: Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 Brian Thomas
- Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 - more on Quantity vs assembly David Berry
- Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 - Serialisation Martin Hill
- Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 - more on Quantity vs assembly Martin -at- ROE
- Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 - inheritance vs aggregation David Berry
- Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 - inheritance vs aggregation Guy Rixon
- Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 Pierre Didelon
- Heaviness of Q (Was: Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 - inheritance vs aggregation Brian Thomas
- Re: Observation data model comments Anita Richards
- Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 Martin Hill
- Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 Brian Thomas
- Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 - inheritance vs aggregation Martin Hill
- Re: Observation data model comments - UML jargon Martin Hill
- Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 Jonathan McDowell
- Re: [QUANTITY] and [OBSERVATION] data models: UCDs with DMs Martin Hill
- Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 - analogue absurdium Brian Thomas
- Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 - analogue absurdium David Berry
- Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 Martin Hill
- Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 - analogue absurdium Martin Hill
- Re: Observation data model comments Pierre Didelon
- Re: Observation data model comments Anita Richards
- Re: Observation data model comments Pierre Didelon
Saturday, 8 May
- Re: Observation data model comments Anita Richards
Friday, 7 May
- Re: Observation data model comments Alberto Micol
- Observation data model comments Anita Richards
Thursday, 6 May
- Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 David Berry
- Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 Pierre Didelon
Wednesday, 5 May
- Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 - analogue absurdium David Berry
- Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 - analogue absurdium Martin Hill
- Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 David Berry
- Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 Pierre Didelon
- Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 - designing jet fighters (off topic design philosophy) Martin Hill
- Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 Ed Shaya
- Re: [QUANTITY] and [OBSERVATION] data models: mutability (off topic?) Martin Hill
- Re: [QUANTITY] and [OBSERVATION] data models: new drafts Francois Bonnarel
- Re: [QUANTITY] and [OBSERVATION] data models: mutability David Berry
- Re: [QUANTITY] and [OBSERVATION] data models: mutability Martin Hill
- Re: [QUANTITY] and [OBSERVATION] data models: new drafts - comments on Quantity David Berry
- Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 David Berry
- Re: [QUANTITY] and [OBSERVATION] data models: new drafts - comments on Quantity David Berry
- Re: [QUANTITY] and [OBSERVATION] data models: new drafts - comments on Quantity Martin Hill
- Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 Alberto Micol
- Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 David Berry
Tuesday, 4 May
- Re: FW: Observation: replies to GL and others Francois Bonnarel
Monday, 3 May
- Re: [QUANTITY] and [OBSERVATION] data models: new drafts - comments on Quantity Martin Hill
- Re: [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 Martin Hill
- Re: [QUANTITY] and [OBSERVATION] data models: new drafts - comments on Quantity Martin Hill
- [QUANTITY] Data Model for Quantity v0.5 Alberto Micol
- Re: [QUANTITY] and [OBSERVATION] data models: new drafts Brian Thomas

Last message date: 2004-05-31Z23:04:05
Archived on: 2009-01-08Z09:06:23 GMT

dm - by date