Re: [Missing Practical Stuff]

From: Ray Plante <rplante-at-ncsa.uiuc.edu>
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2004 04:34:41 -0500 (CDT)


On Thu, 3 Jun 2004, Guy Rixon wrote:
> yes there might be overlap with registry. However, registry doesn't yet have
> metadata to describe format of available data, only the syntax of a service
> interface or the contextual metadata of a data collection. I don't think there
> are metadata to say, e.g. "this service emits VOTable/FITS" o

Actually, the RM (and thus the VOResource schema) does include the "Format" metadatum; when applied to a service, this is exactly what it is intended to say. Metadata for a specific service may specify this in more detail.

Nevertheless, Francois is not talking about a service but an "Observation". Specifically, he is discussing specifically the format of some external data file. Thus, the VOResource metadatum may not apply particularly well.

cheers,
Ray Received on 2004-06-03Z09:35:19