Matthew says:
> there is nothing wrong with mixed content.
> In fact, it is used elsewhere in the IVOA already [...]
> we should be consistent right across the IVOA
Oooh! A good time to trot out an Emerson quote:
A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds
There is an implicit proposal on the hypothetical table. It goes something like:
While mixed XML content is strictly legal, it is likely to reveal limitations of tools and libraries adopted by IVOA. As such, no IVOA Recommendations will permit XML documents containing: - non-empty elements with attributes - elements enclosing both sub-elements and literal values
Further, there appears to be a suggestion that numbers must be written as attributes:
>> Why actually do we need that number right between the tags instead >> of in an attribute?
so also forbid:
If this is the proposal, I'll open the polling with a "no" vote. Another word for "mixed" content is "flexible" content.
Rob Seaman
NOAO
Received on 2006-09-15Z17:57:45