Re: sexagesimal

From: Roy Williams <roy-at-cacr.caltech.edu>
Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 17:35:04 -0700


> Alberto

Thank you for your support and code. I think I might have made typos in my supposedly identical examples of sexg strings.

> Only one group, ***the last one***, can be a float.

It would have the advantage of placating the IRAF contingent, but perhaps it is a little brittle, depending as it does on the presence of a tiny decimal point?

1h 2.m 3d 4m 5.s --> RA=1h 2m 0s, Dec = 3d 4m 0s is different from
1h 2m 3.d 4m 5.s --> RA=1h 2m 3s, Dec = 4d 5m 0s

Roy

California Institute of Technology
626 395 3670 Received on 2006-09-17Z02:35:34