hi. Guy,
I am sorry for my misunderstanding of your words.
Maybe it is too early to decide whether OGSI services become _mandatory_ for any part of IVOA.
Cheers,
Chenzhou
Guy Rixon wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Chenzhou Cui wrote:
>
>
>>Guy Rixon wrote: >> >> >>>On Mon, 22 Sep 2003, Alasdair Allan wrote: >>> >>>... >>>Recently, I'm beginning to wonder if OGSI is worth the bother. Here in Java >>>land, we're stuck with GT3 as the only implementation, which makes development >>>slow and difficult. Parastatidis et al. have questioned the usefulness of >>>OGSI as a standard, proposing an alternative that matches better to web >>>services standards. If we don't do OGSI now, I'm wondering if it will have >>>become obsolete by the time we need to exploit it. >>> >>>... >> >>I think it is suitable for a small VO project, such as China-VO, to >>focus its effort on one choice or just a few choices. We can adopt other >>technologies after they have been implemented successfully in other VO >>projects.
>
> Guy Rixon gtr-at-ast.cam.ac.uk
> Institute of Astronomy Tel: +44-1223-337542
> Madingley Road, Cambridge, UK, CB3 0HA Fax: +44-1223-337523
-- ============================================================ Chenzhou Cui National Astronomical Observatory | Tel: (8610)64877703-1328 Chinese Academy of Sciences | FAX: (8610)64878240 Datun Road 20A, Chaoyang District | Email: ccz-at-bao.ac.cn Beijing 100012, China | WWW: www.lamost.org/~cb ============================================================Received on 2003-09-23Z14:37:23