Re: Version numbering (was: citing IVOA standards)

On 23 Jun 2008, at 11:39, Norman Gray wrote:

>
> Greetings,
>
> On 2008 Jun 17, at 00:41, Séverin Gaudet wrote:
>
>> "Standards numbering nomenclature" (http://www.ivoa.net/cgi-bin/
>> twiki/bin/view/IVOA/TCGStandardsNumberingNomenclature).
>
>
> Thus for a given document, we will have DRAFT-20080101,
> WD-20080201, PR-20080301 and either REC-1.0 or plain '1.0'. That
> scheme is monotonic (so satisfies properties (a) and (b)), and
> makes the document's status explicit rather than implicit.

Norman

Why not go the whole hog and adopt the same approach for the REC documents? I believe this is what W3C has done for Recommendations, e.g.

http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-owl-ref-20040210/

or

http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/REC-xhtml1-20020801/

for an example of a Recommendation that has an update.

Cheers,

        Sean

--
Sean Bechhofer
School of Computer Science
University of Manchester
sean.bechhofer-at-manchester.ac.uk
http://www.cs.manchester.ac.uk/people/bechhofer