On Wed, 25 Jun 2008, Robert Hanisch wrote:
> A WD1.0, PR1.0, and REC1.0 can all be identical (and generally are) save for
> the boilerplate text at the beginning that identifies the status of the
> document.
really? I agree that they can in principle have identical content, but in most cases surely the point of the WD->PR->REC progression, along with the associated discussions and RFC periods, is so that improvements can be made to the more provisional drafts in order to come up with a higher quality public recommendation.
Mark
-- Mark Taylor Astronomical Programmer Physics, Bristol University, UK m.b.taylor@bris.ac.uk +44-117-928-8776 http://www.star.bris.ac.uk/~mbt/Received on 2008-06-25Z16:34:37