> Hi Anita,
>
> Thanks for all that. Are these the sum total of changes made to RSMv7? Or do
> you need more time to come up with a full commentary on RSMv7?
>
> Cheers,
> Tony.
Hi Tony,
I would like to try and get in a couple more data sets - Elizabeth has sent me an STP one and I would like to tackle HIJ/PASS (even if the resulting schema is not being used for the Ango-Aus demo) and, funnily enough, a radio interferometry data set ... Also, I should go back and look at it with respect to the handful of science cases we broke down in detail. That is still not comprehensive of course, and I think it is a mistake if we ever think the schema are finished - although there does need to be fixed update points. Most of all, I would like any comments from others - probably along the lines of 'we have already decided xxx so drop yyy' or 'you can't DO that in xml!' . I also need to know opinions on where we do the unit conversions - at present I get the impression that Bob was recommending that the Registry descriptions of datasets are in a restricted set of units, and that sounds sensible to me - that way, we would only have to do ultra-accurate conversions for the data which were actually used for each query.
But, give me a deadline and I will produce a more coherent and concise commentary on RSMv7 - if it is tomorrow it will just be extracted from my present ramblings...
thanks
a
Received on 2003-06-18Z10:55:55