Re: Request for Contact.PhoneNumber

From: Ray Plante <rplante-at-ncsa.uiuc.edu>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 12:46:16 -0500 (CDT)


On Mon, 22 May 2006, Robert Hanisch wrote:
> So, to be rigorous we should put Contact.Telephone back into the RM
> document. Perhaps we can skip a full re-review given that the element is
> still in the schema.

Yes, let's consider this as response to the RFC ;-). BTW, address is still in there as well. Should we put this into RM, too? Might as well.

Here's how they are currently documented, but I will change them to what goes in the RM.

 contact/telephone:

    the contact telephone number.
    Complete international dialing codes should be given, e.g.     "+1-410-338-1234".

 contact/address:

    the contact mailing address.
    All components of the mailing address are given in one     string, e.g. "3700 San Martin Drive, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA".

cheers,
Ray Received on 2006-05-22Z19:46:06