Ray Plante wrote:
> Robert Hanisch wrote:
>> So, to be rigorous we should put Contact.Telephone back into the RM
>> document. Perhaps we can skip a full re-review given that the
>> element is
>> still in the schema.
>
> Yes, let's consider this as response to the RFC ;-). BTW, address is
> still in there as well. Should we put this into RM, too? Might as
> well.
Yes please!
Al. Received on 2006-05-22Z22:07:49