On Tue, 20 Jun 2006, Paul Harrison wrote:
> On 19.06.2006, at 17:59, Ray Plante wrote:
>
> > o I got rid of the separate RegistryInterface.xsd file; since this
> > schema is used only by RegistrySearch, it seems just as easy to
> > include it directly in the <types> section of the WSDL.
>
> That is rather a shame, as it was a useful schema against which you
> could validate instance documents with multiple resources in, and it
> is also a sort of statement of the current recommended set of schema
> extensions.
Good point. If it has a use, I'm not opposed to keeping. This was just in the interest of limiting the number of files and namespaces we have to wrestle with.
cheers,
Ray
Received on 2006-06-20Z17:06:14