Recently noticed is if you read the wsdl the Resource should have the same
namespace as the wsdl and VOResources. Current Astrogrid test registry
has no namespace on Resource, will try to correct this when I get back
(Thursday).
Though I should note, I now remember we had the VOResources in a seperate schema with elementformdefault set to unqualified. Meaning Resource elements did not need a namespace. But that got lost when we got rid of the schema and brought it back into the wsdl.
If people on the registry list wish to make Resource to have no namespace.
(Which might possibly make things a little easier to understand since OAI
responses don't have a namespace and the schema is already at
unqualified/no namespaces for the rest of the elements.)
Then we can change the wsdl accordingly. Thought I would kick off that
discussion here to see what everybody else thinks.
On Thursday I will read responses and if no decision was made or decision to keep it like it is then I will change the test registry to have the "Resource" elements and the "identifier" elements(when identifieronly is set) to have the same namespace as the wsdl.
cheers,
Kevin
Received on 2006-08-26Z15:34:31