On 28.09.2006, at 12:50, Kevin Benson wrote:
>>
>> Option 2 I think is good. I can see Paul asking the question can
>> we move VOResources back into the RegistryInterface.xsd :) Which
>> might be good means all our Operation defined elements are in the
>> WSDL and child elements come from a seperate schema.
>>
Actually I did suggest that! - but we have been having email problems here too, and I think it never got to the list....
Paul.
Paul Harrison
ESO Garching
www.eso.org
Received on 2006-09-29Z09:09:41