Ray,
v1.0 of VODataService has already been issued and used; I'm writing software against it today that I hope to release next week. We really shouldn't be redefining the schema for a namespace that is in use. I vote that the changes be held over to v1.1.
Guy
On 7 Jun 2007, at 13:41, Ray Plante wrote:
> Hi RWGers,
>
> Thanks to those of you have responded with comments on results from
> Beijing available on the twiki at
> http://www.ivoa.net/twiki/bin/view/IVOA/IOMay07RWGIssues. As you
> may recall, I've asked that you get you comments in by tomorrow,
> June 8.
>
> I want to draw your special attention to issue #8 which proposes
> CHANGING THE VORESOURCE SCHEMA. Unless I hear complaints other
> wise, we will proceed with the first proposal in which we issue a
> new version of the schema with *no change in the namespace URL*.
>
> thanks,
> Ray
Received on 2007-06-07Z15:04:44