> Sorry to add to the noise - wasn't trying to be facetious, it just
> comes naturally.
Far be it for me to cast the first stone!
> using IVOA semantic tools in our aggressively pragmatic workflow. I
Can you elaborate on the workflow, Rob? Al's post seemed to imply that inserting semantic tools anywhere would be too time-costly to be worthwhile.
T.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-semantics-at-eso.org [mailto:owner-semantics-at-eso.org] On
> Behalf Of Rob Seaman
> Sent: 13 September 2007 17:53
> To: semantics-at-ivoa.net
> Subject: Re: membership request
>
> > Yes, I'd assumed Rob's comments and request were a p***-take until
> > Andrea
> > answered him seriously - maybe a language thing :)
>
> Sorry to add to the noise - wasn't trying to be facetious, it just
> comes naturally. The WG wiki seemed pretty cut and dried about a
> closed membership policy. Glad to hear that ain't so.
>
> In any event, VOEvent remains deeply interested in developing and
> using IVOA semantic tools in our aggressively pragmatic workflow. I
> don't believe Rick will be joining us in the UK. Is there somebody
> else who would like to present the evolving IVOA world view regarding
> vocabularies at either the BoF or InterOp session?
>
> Rob
Received on 2007-09-13Z22:15:26