RE: SV: do we need it?

From: Tony Linde <Tony.Linde-at-leicester.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 16:59:30 +0100


Back to being facetious? J  

It pays to check these things - I've had efforts derailed in the past for not including all the appropriate stakeholders. And I assumed the list of stakeholders in a SV would be rather larger than the IVOA.  

T.  

From: owner-semantics-at-eso.org [mailto:owner-semantics-at-eso.org] On Behalf Of Rob Seaman
Sent: 14 September 2007 16:30
To: semantics-at-ivoa.net
Subject: Re: SV: do we need it?  

Tony inquires:

Is there some IAU (or similar) group we ought to engage with to ensure that this effort is welcomed by astronomers?
The IVOA is that IAU group. We fall under Commission 5. The "O" in IVOA is there for a reason.  

Rob Received on 2007-09-14Z18:00:38