On Thu, 20 Sep 2007, Andrea Preite Martinez wrote:
> - YES, we can go on discussing/commenting/editing it, with the ultimate goal
> to define an IVOA SV standard.
We should continue this. The most important thing at this point is content, not format. Experimentation re SKOS/OWL/RDF etc. can proceed in parallel and should be prototyped. If necessary, it will be possible to restructure the vocabulary later for better integration with whatever technology proves a better match for our applications.