Just some quick comments on the IAU.rdf:
Missing ZZ_Ceti_star concept definition, something like this:
<skos:Concept rdf:about="#ZZ_Ceti_stars"> <skos:inScheme rdf:resource=""/> <skos:prefLabel>ZZ Cetus stars</skos:prefLabel> <skos:altLabel>ZZ Ceti stars</skos:altLabel> <skos:definition>ZZ Ceti stars</skos:definition> </skos:Concept>
I don't understand why there are so many TopConcepts, most of which have many layers of broader things above it. For instance _21_cm_line is a top concept, yet broader is radio_recombination_lines, broader is recombination_lines, broader is emission_lines, broader is specral_lines. I would perhaps accept spectral_lines as a TopConcept.
By the way it is real easy to see these details in the OWL version.
Just add the the line
<owl:Ontology rdf:about=""> </owl:Ontology>
I also added
xmlns:IAU="http://www.Astro.physik.Uni-Goettingen.DE/~hessman/rdf/IAU#" xml:base="http://www.Astro.physik.Uni-Goettingen.DE/~hessman/rdf/IAU"
so that I could delete the http:.... in every line, reduces the size by a good amount.
Ed
Frederic V. Hessman wrote:
> On 4 Oct 2007, at 3:59 pm, Alasdair Gray wrote:
>> Hi Rick, >> >> I just tried to access the rdf version of your file >> http://www.astro.physik.uni-goettingen.de/~hessman/rdf/IAU.rdf but got >> an error message back. >> >> In case you are not aware, there is an rdf validation service >> available from the W3C from http://www.w3.org/RDF/Validator/. I ran >> the URL through this service but I'm not sure how useful the output is.
>> A few minor things (just rapidly browsing through): >> >> -SPH means "smooth" or "smoothed" part. hd
>> -Temperature has NT electron_temperature
>> - post_AGB absent
>> -AGN : for the ontology we asked a specialist to give us a detailed >> up-to-date AGN taxonomy. That part has to be "refreshed"! I can pass >> you the file.