On 10/5/07 Frederic V. Hessman wrote:
>
> > B)
> >
> > A couple of terms have spaces in them which should probably be
> converted to "_"
>
> Got those too. In the meanwhile, I've found various capitalization
> errors and stuck in some missing stuff for galaxy rotation curves
> (e.g. "Navarro-Frenk-White_profiles" anybody?).
>
> Thanks for the corrections. Please keep them coming so that we can
> get this finished as a reasonable and reasonably complete (for our
> intial purposes only, of course) suggestion.
>
> Douglas implicitly raises a good point: the text file isn't much
> simpler than n3 and n3 is a lot less verbose than SKOS/OWL - should
> the IVOA suggest vocabularies are published in n3?
>
> Rick
Rick,
I do much prefer to look at RDF/N3 rather than RDF/XML...
I have a question about the format of the identifiers used.
If you look at the N3 form that cwm generates
<http://www.Astro.physik.Uni-Goettingen.DE/~hessman/rdf/IAU#He+_ionization_zone>
which I guess comes about because of the "+" character. In itself it's just ugly, and not a real issue, but I've come across cases where certain parsers [*] didn't like the fragments to contain the "." character, or start with a number, so I wonder if we should take care in how we create the fragments, even if my reading of http://gbiv.com/protocols/uri/rfc/rfc3986.html#collected-abnf is that we can use these characters.
[* whatever parser it is that longwell, http://simile.mit.edu/wiki/Longwell, uses]
Doug Received on 2007-10-05Z21:21:53