Rob Seaman wrote:
>
> Rather than adding to the Thesaurus, perhaps we should be considering
> renorming it into separate sub-vocabularies. This will clarify the
> missing pieces (e.g., GRBs) needed for pragmatic transient reporting
> and classification.
This sounds like a good idea. Could you create a subset of the skos/rdf
file that covers just voevent terminology? Then we could work on
ensuring that we have what we need for that.
Ed Received on 2007-10-09Z23:24:09