On Thursday 01 November 2007 1:06:55 pm Frederic V. Hessman wrote:
> At the time, there where lots of voices saying that, while you are
> perfectly correct (and I'd prefer to have them as humanly readable as
> possible), the realities of computer-based parsing mean that a
> trivial token format costs less pain.
>
> How about an official show of hands?
Could we have the arguments against human readable again first, before voting?
attached mail follows:
On Thursday 01 November 2007 1:06:55 pm Frederic V. Hessman wrote:
> At the time, there where lots of voices saying that, while you are
> perfectly correct (and I'd prefer to have them as humanly readable as
> possible), the realities of computer-based parsing mean that a
> trivial token format costs less pain.
>
> How about an official show of hands?
Could we have the arguments against human readable again first, before voting?
-brian Received on 2007-11-01Z21:21:22