On Nov 2, 2007, at 3:03 AM, Alasdair Gray wrote:
> So, the purpose of this email was to highlight that we are
> deviating from the original IAU Thesaurus poly-hierarchy and to
> argue that this is a good thing and that we should keep going this
> way. Does anyone object?
No objection here, but has anyone thought to contact the authors of the IAU Thesaurus for comments - or even better yet, to gauge their interest in joining the effort? The point of the IVOA, after all, is to be of service to the astronomical community. The IAU is a key way to reach same.
Rob Received on 2007-11-02Z14:48:15