Hi,
Following Rick's distribution of his skos version of the UCD tokens, I
found an error in my own version. I have now corrected this. The new
version is available from
http://explicator.dcs.gla.ac.uk/Vocabularies/UCD1-v1.0.rdf
Unlike Rick, I have not added in fake tokens. Thus, I have
Vocabulary Concepts Top Concepts Notes
Cheers,
Alasdair
Alasdair J G Gray
Research Associate: Explicator Project
http://explicator.dcs.gla.ac.uk
Computer Science, University of Glasgow
0141 330 6292
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-semantics-at-eso.org [mailto:owner-semantics-at-eso.org] On Behalf
Of Frederic V. Hessman
Sent: 14 November 2007 17:34
To: IVOA semantics
Subject: Mark II vocabularies
Following Alaisdairs suggestion, I went back and cleaned up the script so that it is used uniformly for all vocabularies. Now, the only difference between any of them is the RDFROOT= and RDFPATH= settings in the makefile. The total number of concepts and the total number of "TopConcepts" arbitrarily defined as the number of concepts with NT links but no BT links (i.e. no orphan concepts) is displayed.
To earn another beer, I also stuck in the UCD1 vocabulary, where the UCD root tokens indeed end up being the TopConcepts. Note that I had to stick in two fake UCD roots to cover the cases phys.particle.neutrino and something else, requiring that there always be a parent separated only by one period.
The current bottom line is
Vocabulary Concepts "Top" Concepts Notes
--
IAU93 2551 265
down from 512, albeit by definition
IVOAT 2891 273
after all, the elements are more than 100 all
by themselves
UCD1 475 12
2 entries are fake!!!
math 1318 15
taken from MathWords.com
--
Try http://www.astro.physik.uni-goettingen.de/~hessman/rdf/ and enjoy!
Rick Received on 2007-11-19Z12:58:20