Folks,
This is probably partly relevant to the [versioning-3] discussion. We've referred to earlier versions of this in other local threads (for example Rick's message about hash and slash namespaces), and to the CoolURIs paper.
It points to a 'configuration validator' for serving vocabularies.
All the best,
http://nxg.me.uk/norman/#norman
Begin forwarded message:
> A new working draft of "Best Practice Recipes for Publishing RDF
> Vocabularies" was published on 23 January, 2008. The W3C Semantic Web
> Deployment Working Group (SWD WG) invites you to comment on this
> document:
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-swbp-vocab-pub-20080123/
>
> This document describes best practice recipes for publishing
> vocabularies or ontologies on the Web (in RDF Schema or OWL). The
> features of each recipe are described in detail, so that vocabulary
> designers may choose the recipe best suited to their needs. Each
> recipe
> introduces general principles and an example configuration for use
> with
> an Apache HTTP server (which may be adapted to other environments).
> The
> recipes are all designed to be consistent with the architecture of the
> Web as currently specified.
>
> W3C Working Drafts provide opportunities for public comment during the
> development of a specification. Please send comments to the public
> mailing list: public-swd-wg-at-w3.org; please include the text "comment
> recipes" in the subject line.
-- Norman Gray : http://nxg.me.uk eurovotech.org : University of LeicesterReceived on 2008-02-01Z11:52:11