On Friday 01 February 2008, Rob Seaman wrote:
> A bit dense - the authors seem to think that documentation is
> equivalent to a core dump - and wacky for presentation details, with
> every token highlighted in some distinct way - but contains a lot
> of good information.
Well, it is a working draft, published to solicit comments. Hint, hint! :-)
Myself, I subscribe do the "publish and be damned" strategy for working drafts, especially the first public working draft. There is no point in doing elaborate internal group working drafts when you know that once it is published, people will throw comments at you that pull you in all directions. All working drafts should be read with this in mind, constructive damnation is usually most welcome! :-)
Best,
Kjetil
-- Kjetil Kjernsmo Programmer / Astrophysicist / Ski-orienteer / Orienteer / Mountaineer kjetil-at-kjernsmo.net Homepage: http://www.kjetil.kjernsmo.net/ OpenPGP KeyID: 6A6A0BBCReceived on 2008-02-01Z21:03:20