Rob Seaman wrote:
> On Feb 4, 2008, at 11:25 AM, Norman Gray wrote:
>
>> I basically agree with Rick on issues 1 and 2. Does anyone else have
>> strong feelings here or should I suggest that these two are
>> provisionally resolved, and adjust the text accordingly.
>
> Seconded (thirded?)
+1 to make whatever total takes your fancy :-P
Alasdair
>
> Also - I don't care if the current draft is called a working draft or
> an internal draft or what, but we shouldn't get hung up on the IVOA
> process. As with any document, the authors (and extended team and
> editors) revise, revise, revise. We're already well along in that
> process. At some point we take the document public and continue to
> revise. Eventually the final revision is reached and shortly
> thereafter publication occurs.
>
> I'm quite confident predicting that publication will occur in a timely
> fashion. In the mean time, lets just knead the standard into shape
> while minimizing the overhead of satisfying external milestones.
>
> - Rob
>
Received on 2008-02-05Z09:31:08