Re: defining stuff (was Re: On the impossibility ...)

From: Ed Shaya <eshaya-at-umd.edu>
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 12:04:31 -0500

>
>> I also would not underestimate the number of times a term has
>> multiple meanings.
>
> Indeed!
>
>> That is unacceptable for us.
>
> Why - and by "us", to what use case(s) are you referring - and what
> are "we" (in this case, the architecture addressing all supported use
> cases) going to do about it?
>

We have to break up a term into several or drop certain meanings. This is where the definition is crucial.

image is both a noun and a verb, and there are two meaning of the noun, so we need three terms where there is now 1. image - n. a photograph or digital representation of a scene obtained by a camera.
focal_image - n. the illusion of a scene created by the focusing of light by a lens or a camera.
image_act - v. the act of creating a focal_image

Coma has 3 meanings that I can think of, but one, a prolonged state of unconsciousnous, we probably can survive without. For the others we need to break into two:
comet_coma - the bright cloud containing the nucleus of a comet and constituting a major portion of the head of a comet. coma - a crescent shaped distortion to point sources in the focal_image of an optical system.

> - Rob
>
Received on 2008-02-07Z18:04:57