Hi,
I am checking that our current vocabularies and the latest draft of the skos reference [1] are consistent. One feature, that Norman has already corrected, is the updated namespace for skos (it is now http://www.w3.org/2008/05/skos#) .
In going through the document, I have found that there is now a skos:notation. To my mind, this would be a natural construct to use to model the position of concepts in the avm hierarchy. Does anyone object to this?
Alasdair
[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-skos-reference-20080609/
[2] http://www.virtualastronomy.org/AVM_Version1.1May312008.pdf
Dr Alasdair J. G. Gray
agray-at-dcs.gla.ac.uk
http://www.dcs.gla.ac.uk/~agray
Received on 2008-07-01Z12:27:27