On Jul 1, 2008, at 3:27 AM, Alasdair Gray wrote:
> In going through the document, I have found that there is now a
> skos:notation. To my mind, this would be a natural construct to use
> to model the position of concepts in the avm hierarchy. Does anyone
> object to this?
Maybe you can comment on why this seems natural, the benefits, any significant downsides, etc? It's hard to imagine I would have any objections - but it's also hard to imagine I'll be able to keep up with evolving drafts of SKOS.
Rob Received on 2008-07-02Z20:07:47