Am cc'ing ivoadoc-at-ivoa.net (Marco) just in case he is not on the stdproc
list.
I agree - we should probably show the documents only in their current category. Also, can we create a view in which all documents in all classes appear together? As it is now, you have to click on each category to find out what's there (at ivoa.net/Documents/).
The mix up on naming conventions is probably my fault, as I was confused by that stuff from the start. Do we think this warrants recycling the standards document back through the process? I would say not. But it will make it necessary to do some cosmetic repair on a couple of the documents already there.
Bob
> While figuring out how to promote the RM document to PR status, I noticed
> that the process standards document was listed in all three areas (WD, PR
> and REC). This could be confusing to anyone browsing the site.
>
> I think it might be better to remove old references from the site, so a
> document only can be found at its highest level. It is still possible to
get
> at old versions using the references in the header of the document.
>
>
> Also, I thought the 'Latest Version' was supposed to have the form
NAME.EXT
> whereas it currently has TYPE-NAME.EXT (though the standard seems to have
> lost this instruction from the Naming Convention - teach me to read
changes
> better) which means that this reference to a document will stop working
when
> a document is promoted. I'd like to suggest we use NAME.EXT.
>
> Cheers,
> Tony.
>
> __
> Tony Linde
> Phone: +44 (0)116 223 1292 Mobile: +44 (0)7753 603356
> Fax: +44 (0)116 252 3311 Email: ael-at-star.le.ac.uk
> Post: Department of Physics & Astronomy,
> University of Leicester
> Leicester, UK LE1 7RH
>
> Project Manager, Director,
> AstroGrid Leicester e-Science Centre
> http://www.astrogrid.org http://www.e-science.le.ac.uk/
>
>
>
Received on 2004-01-23Z16:31:35