Hi Tony,
actually, for the other schema in the /xml tree we are using the following:
therefore the skynode should be something like:
Cheers,
Marco
Tony Linde wrote:
>It looks like we should quickly come up with a *standard* way of versioning
>namespaces. This is a little out of my field: does the following suggestion
>from Martin work as a standard? Or do we already have a standard?
>
>We need to namespace standard interfaces (eg SkyNode) and any of the
>parameters that those interfaces may take (eg ADQL as input, VOTable as
>output).
>
>Should we have a 'namespace' resource in the registry and use its identifier
>as the namespace?
>
>Cheers,
>Tony.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-voql-at-eso.org [mailto:owner-voql-at-eso.org] On Behalf Of Wil
>O'Mullane
>Sent: 17 March 2004 14:03
>To: Martin @ ROE
>Cc: voql-at-ivoa.net
>Subject: Re: Versioning SkyNode WSDL
>
>This is the only one we made and its an old ADQL version.
>Yes when we put the new adql in I will make sure we version it also.
>The namespace also sounds fine
>
>On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 10:14:49AM +0000, Martin @ ROE wrote:
>
>
>>Me again -
>>
>>Can we start to version the SkyNode WSDL? Following the links on
>>http://www.ivoa.net/twiki/bin/view/IVOA/IvoaVOQL I get to
>>http://SkyService.pha.jhu.edu/devel/SkyNode/SkyNode.asmx?WSDL.
>>
>>However this has 'http://voql.ivoa.net/' as its namespace; can we make
>>this eg 'http://skynode.ivoa.net/v0.n'?
>>
>>What version are we on anyay?!
>>
>>Cheers,
>>
>>Martin
>>
>>
>>--
>>Martin Hill
>>Software Engineer, AstroGrid (ROE)
>>07901 55 24 66
>>
Received on 2004-03-18Z10:33:49