On 23 Jun 2007, at 8:52 pm, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
>
> Andrea,
>
> I guess I don't feel that
> phot.flux.density;em.wl,stat.max
> (and similar) are 'cumbersome' - I find them much easier
> to understand than extra custom-crafted UCDs like ..perWave.
> I feel that em.wl, em.freq, etc. are naturally adjectives as well as
> nouns
> For em.*: in the context of the doc, this is a shorthand for
> (EITHER em.wl OR em.freq OR em.energy).
I confess that I have a hard time with all of these solutions, since they are workable only if the assumptions behind them are clearly defined (and who is going to garantee that someone teaches a computer correctly?).
In order to manipulate the numbers, the VO apps are going to have to deal with the units anyway, so I'd prefer one of two extreme solutions:
or
2. Pendanticism, e.g. W/m^2/micron =
em.energy;stat.perSqrMeter;stat.perTime;stat.perWavelength
I know these comments are late - so you can promptly delete this email - but these seem much more workable solutions.
Rick
Dr. Frederic V. Hessman Hessman-at-Astro.physik.Uni-Goettingen.DE Institut für Astrophysik Tel. +49-551-39-5052 Friedrich-Hund-Platz 1 Fax +49-551-39-5043 37077 Goettingen Room F04-133http://www.Astro.physik.Uni-Goettingen.de/~hessman
http://monet.Uni-Goettingen.de ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------------------Received on 2007-06-25Z07:59:29