Use case: distance

From: Ed Shaya <Edward.J.Shaya.1-at-gsfc.nasa.gov>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 16:02:05 -0400

Roy again asked for some use cases for UCD's so here is my favorite.
I need accurate distances to nearby galaxies.  So, I am very picky as to the kind of distance estimate.  E.G., a distance derived from a redshift will not do for nearby galaxies. So I can't just query on phys:distance, there must be a simple way to distinguish the distance quantity by method used to obtain the distance.  And to look through every paper on distances of galaxies, one by one, would take months.

Most desireable methods:
Period-Luminosity Relation of Cepheid variables
ditto for RR-Lyrae variables
CCD-based  IR-Tully-Fisher Relation (rotation velocity  vs.  IR  Magnitude)
Tip of the Red Giant Branch (brightest TRGB stars)    
Supergiant Stars atomic hydrogen Equivalent widths vs stellar mag
spectroscopic eclipsing binaries (none published yet)
Maser orbits
Type Ia Supernovae Peak Brightness
Surface Brightness Fluctuations

Less desired (>20% error):

Redshift using Hubble relation or some other flow model
Brightest Stars
B-band Tully-Fisher Relation
IR-Tully-Fisher with single aperture IR magnitudes
Dn-Sigma (alias: Faber-Jackson Relation) (central size vs velocity displersion)
Expanding Photosphere (Baade-Wasselink Method)
    *Supernova
    *Planetary Nebula
Largest HII regions

Perhaps the simplest thing is to have error bars for all data and then one could
simply ask for small error bar data.  But distance papers are notorious for underestimating errors.  So one needs to use knowledge from cross-studies on what the real errors on these various distance estimators are.

Another similar example would be the temperature of a star or ISM cloud.
There are various techniques for obtaining that property, but each one measures a substantially different statistic of T or T at various depth.

So, is this a job for UCDs?  Data Model?  Shouldn't standard astronomical methods of obtaining a property be part of our controlled vocabulary?  If not in UCDs then in some other dictionary/ontology? Or is it beyond our wildest dreams? (Well not mine, but ours.)

Ed

Received on 2003-10-23Z20:00:57