(no subject)

Hi Patricio, et al.,

This question of accurate/inaccurate description was discussed many times --- and one of the results was the definition of 2 different entities :
-- the UCDs which have the role of broad classification

• the "utype" was introduced to fulfil the role of the accurate description -- the "utype" being in principle connected to a data model which gives the necessary level of detail.

In the photometric domain, each of the two entities has its role:
-- from a ucd: 2 quantities showing the same UCD can be compared

   at least in a statistical way;
-- from a utype: the accurate specification of each filter must be

   accessible; quantities can then be combined.    In practice however the required level of details is frequently    not fully known.

There is exactly the same problem in the astrometric domain: while UCDs can be used to define the RA and Dec, an accurate definition of these values requires a lot of extra parameters
-- have a look at Arnold's Space-Time model and be sure you
have specified everything if you want to be accurate... In many practical cases -- e.g. for statistical cross-matching -- a full description is not required, and then the UCDs have their place.

--francois

Francois Ochsenbein       ------       Observatoire Astronomique de Strasbourg
   11, rue de l'Universite F-67000 STRASBOURG       Phone: +33-(0)390 24 24 29
Email: francois-at-astro.u-strasbg.fr   (France)         Fax: +33-(0)390 24 24 17
================================================================================