Hi folks,
My only comment on this is to ask whether it is better to have each RFM sent out to the Scientific Board as soon as it is submitted or whether they should be collected over a period (three months?) and have the Scientific Board then debate those RFMs which have accumulated during that period.
My question is really based on own experience and working habits. If I see an email arriving about a single proposed UCD amendment I'm probably unlikely to take time to consider it if I'm busy, whereas, if I know I have a few hours' work to do every quarter I'm more likely to set aside a period of time for doing that work properly.
What do other people think?
cheers
Bob Received on 2005-10-19Z10:10:43