Hi,
I'd be in favor of not changing the UCD Rec, and trying to follow the guidelines, therefore changing:
phot.fluxDens phot.flux.density phot.fluxDens.sb phot.flux.density.sb phys.energyDensity phys.energy.density phys.massToLight phys.mass.light or phys.MLratio phys.massYield phys.mass.yield or phys.elementYield and also as Pierre suggested: phys.at phys.atom (also changing words at levels below phys.at)
The debate on the usefulness of the semicolon at the end of the UCD1+
was concluded by introducing this rule of "no word should be substring
of another
at the same level".
The main motivation was that users would be reluctant to add a ;
at the end of every UCD. With the suggested rule, UCD curators have
to be careful when defining new words (what we do now, but only once
hopefully), but users life is made slightly easier.
Sebastien.
--
_______
/ ~ /, Sebastien Derriere mailto:derriere-at-astro.u-strasbg.fr
/ ~~~~ // Observatoire de Strasbourg Phone +33 (0) 390 242 444
/______// 11, rue de l'universite Telefax +33 (0) 390 242 417
(______(/ F-67000 Strasbourg France
Received on 2005-11-07Z19:13:34