NEW ADQL draft + BNF grammar

From: Iņaki Ortiz de Landaluce <Inaki.Ortiz-at-sciops.esa.int>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 15:47:08 +0200


Hi All,

Based on the inputs received so far (from Jeff mainly) I have compiled a new draft version of both the ADQL specification and the BNF grammar. You can find both in the attached document [ADQL-20070419.doc]

In order to make the grammar more readable I have produced a few snapshots of the dependencies among all non-terminal symbols [token.png, valueExpression.png, querySpecification.png and searchCondition.png]. To do so, I have used UML class diagrams. Though BNF and UML do no translate each other very well I still believe the result worths the effort. I hope these diagrams help to understand better the present and the missing bits of the grammar.

Going through Jeff's comments and the previous draft I have tried to identify the main issues that are still open. Please take note of them to discuss them asap! These are:

If you find that there are other issues to discuss, please do not hesitate to add items to this list.

Last but not least you can find attached a detailed description of what has been changed in both the specification and the grammar [changes.html]. Though the feature to track the changes in the word document is still enabled (and used) I thought it would still be useful to have them listed in a separate file.

I would like to take this opportunity to thank Jeff Lusted whose comments on the first draft have been extremely valuable and have helped us a lot to produce this second one (Kona, I guess you will forward this email to him).

That's all from my side. I hope you find all that useful.

Cheers

Inaki

ADQL Draft 19 April 2007

Changes in the document

querySpecification.png searchCondition.png token.png valueExpression.png
Received on 2007-04-24Z15:47:52