Dear all,
thanks very much to all those putting an effort in the recent discussions. I think we are really close to fulfilling our goal of finishing the ADQL.
I would like to propose the following approach for answering the RFC comments currently (at the time of writing this mail) at the RFC pages: each comment is assigned to a person who writes a detailed answer and prepares to expose it to the community during the VOQL session, if necessary.
Briefly, I think it would be interesting to have the following approximate schema (see details below):
This is more or less it. Each of you could write an answer for the allocated comment, send it to the group, and I'd eventually upload it to the Wiki pages signing as I said in a previous mail (e.g.: Pat Dowler for the VOQL-TEG. Approved by Chair).
Comment
Content
VOQL-TEG Member
(Bob) Section 1
Mainly typos
Inaki
(Bob) Section 2.3.2
Relation of REGION and STC-S
Jeff & Pat
(Bob) Section 2.3.2.2.3, 2.3.2.2.4
Utility Calculations
Jeff
(Bob) Section 2.3.2.2.5.6
INTERSECTS
Inaki
(Bob) Section 2.3.2.2.5.11
RECTANGLE
Pat
(Bob) Section 2.3.2.2.6
Typos
Inaki
(Francois) 1.-
Spherical Distance
Pat
(Francois) 2.-
Units
Francois
(Francois) a.-
String or Binary Objects
Benjamin
(Roy) (1)
Include vocabulary of Coordinate Systems
Francois
(Roy) (3)
Written examples in the doc
Yuji
(Roy) (4)
Escaping URIs
Inaki
(Roy) (5)
Region and STC (same as (Bob) 2.3.2)
Pat & Jeff
(Mark) 1.-
Units (Same as (Francois 2.-))
Francois
(Mark) 2.-
LON and LAT
Benjamin
(Mark) 3.-
Coords vocab (Same as Roy(1))
Francois
I will read my mail from home, and will arrive in Trieste on Sunday afternoon. It would be interesting to pencil the answers so that at least we can have some idea by Monday.
Thanks very much.
Cheers,
P.
European Space Agency (ESA)
European Space Astronomy Centre (ESAC)
Science Operations Department (SCI-O)
Science Archives and Computer Support Engineering Unit (SCI-OE)
e-mail: Pedro.Osuna-at-esa.int
Tel + 34 91 813 13 14 Fax: +34 91 813 11 72