I've glanced at all the recent messages but won't have time to digest them
until next week when I hope to take time to look at the two versions in
detail - can we hold off until then on deciding which to use.
On the issue of cardinality it seems simple: either we simplify the ADQL/x from what is automatically generated or we don't. If we agree to a simpler schema than the generated one then it is daft not to allow cardinality of 2..* for ANDs, ORs etc. **This does not change anything about the language or how it is interpreted in any way!** It is ONLY a matter of simplifying how any query is _represented_ in xml form.
To me the choice is: do we want to simplify the representation of a query in xml or not? If no, then we stick with 0.7.1; if yes, then cardinality of 2..* has to be included in 0.7.3.
Now back to AstroGrid-2!
Cheers,
Tony.
__
Tony Linde
Phone: +44 (0)116 223 1292 Mobile: +44 (0)7753 603356
Fax: +44 (0)116 252 3311 Email: ael-at-star.le.ac.uk
Post: Department of Physics & Astronomy,now, back to
University of Leicester
Leicester, UK LE1 7RH
Project Manager, Director,
AstroGrid Leicester e-Science Centre
http://www.astrogrid.org http://www.e-science.le.ac.uk/
Received on 2004-03-04Z12:28:01