Mandatory transports for VOSpace - why not?

From: Paul Harrison <pharriso-at-eso.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 15:09:19 +0200


I think I have made it pretty clear why I think that the VOSpace specification should include some mandatory protocols - i.e. so that VOSpace implementations that are compliant have a common set of protocols that they can interoperate with - I genuinely do not understand the arguments for *not* mandating some protocols - can someone put forward these arguments?

Paul Harrison
ESO Received on 2006-06-19Z15:10:19